On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:46 AM Aleksandra Fedorova <al...@bookwar.info> wrote: > > I propose to change the scope of the SIG a bit. > > Maintaining packages could be one of the activities of the SIG, but its > primary purpose should be to deal with this topic in general. > > Watch for orphans, develop orphaning and retirement workflows, develop a > strategy how to manage those cases, how to prevent them, suggest guidelines > on how to decide whether or not one should move package to the module - > topics like that. > > It extends the scope, but it also opens some possibilities for us to work on > the root cause. > > What do you think?
I agree 100% here. Since my intention was to improve the situation around orphaned packages, this is exactly what I was thinking about: - provide (temporary) maintenance of important, orphaned packages - monitor orphaned packages, spot issues early, actively look for new maintainers - probably report the current status regularly - discuss and refine the current orphaning / retirement process Fabio > -- > Aleksandra Fedorova > bookwar > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
