On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:29 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 14. 08. 19 8:55, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > It depends on package maintainer. If upstream dropped 32-bit support, > I'd stop > > building it for that arch in Fedora. > > > > Why would package maintainer have to bear the burden of potential > breakage if > > upstream doesn't test it? > > If neither of my upstreams officially supports s390x, should I just drop > it > everywhere? > The real question which every packager should ask himself is: Do I have the capacity (time, knowledge, hardware, etc.) to solve problems on non-supported architecture by upstream? And if the answer is no - it is probably better to drop the arch instead of shipping smth that not even the maintainer knows whether it is usable at all (like I used to ship eclipse on 32 bit arm although I'm quite sure it was not usable at all). > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
