On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>
wrote:
By actively offering the proprietary Chrome to the users instead of
explaining the above, you are actually pointing them towards using
proprietary software instead of Free Software for no reason.
I think you're probably right that people mainly want Chrome for the
multimedia support. But well, surely you are well aware that we'll
never be able to point to the rpmfusion codecs packages in any official
location. I know it's very frustrating, but the legal team is just
trying to protect Red Hat (and Fedora). It would be helpful to please
keep your argumentation within the realm of the legal constraints we
have to respect.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
