On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 13:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> It's also important to understand the current state of optical media
> release criteria. We've dropped the blocker requirement for most
> installation media two years ago. Only Everything netinst and Workstation
> Live remained. This proposal suggests that we drop these last two as well.
> If you're concerned about Server DVD or KDE Live or something else - there
> is no change for you.

As per my mail earlier in the thread, I'd suggest this is inaccurate.

Back at the time we reduced the set of tested images, the idea was
explicitly that we can test just *one* live image and just *one*
installer image as 'representatives' of the others. If one live image
boots, we can be fairly sure all live images boot. If one installer
image boots, we can be fairly sure all installer images boot. This is
because all lives are built identically so far as boot stuff goes, as
are all installer images.

This is *specifically* the idea we sold that change on, so it's kinda
logically invalid to then try and sell *this* Change on "well we only
test these two images ANYWAY so if you don't use them you shouldn't
care". It'd be trying to have things two opposite ways.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to