On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 13:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > It's also important to understand the current state of optical media > > release criteria. We've dropped the blocker requirement for most > > installation media two years ago. Only Everything netinst and Workstation > > Live remained. This proposal suggests that we drop these last two as > well. > > If you're concerned about Server DVD or KDE Live or something else - > there > > is no change for you. > > As per my mail earlier in the thread, I'd suggest this is inaccurate. > > Back at the time we reduced the set of tested images, the idea was > explicitly that we can test just *one* live image and just *one* > installer image as 'representatives' of the others. If one live image > boots, we can be fairly sure all live images boot. If one installer > image boots, we can be fairly sure all installer images boot. This is > because all lives are built identically so far as boot stuff goes, as > are all installer images. > > This is *specifically* the idea we sold that change on, so it's kinda > logically invalid to then try and sell *this* Change on "well we only > test these two images ANYWAY so if you don't use them you shouldn't > care". It'd be trying to have things two opposite ways. > Fair point, that was an invalid argument from my side. Even though e.g. Server DVD hasn't been optical-blocking for some time, it still gained the benefits of test coverage or fixes in other media which were optical-blocking.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
