On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:14 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:27:36AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > One potential output of this change would be to have editions choose > > what buildroot they are based on. As an example, Fedora Server, which > > has struggled to find its element, could actually be built in ways > > more conducive to server use cases: different compiler flags, kernel > > parameters, baselines, etc. > > Possibly, but also splitting things means they have less people using > them, and also there may be less compromise to come up with something > everyone can share.
This may be true, but if the number of people grows as a result, that might be worth it. No need to decide right nwo of course. Part of what is good about Aleksandra's proposal is that it's incremental- each step along the way has a specific benefit. The long term potential for this is exciting, but the short and medium term benefits seem good too. Change can happen a little at a time then be measured and adjusted as needed. > But I'm perfectly happy to give this a try and see where it leads us. :) Cool :-) -- Brendan Conoboy / RHEL Development Coordinator / Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
