> Il giorno 21 gen 2020, alle ore 18:15, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:40 PM Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com
> <mailto:lgrif...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Everyone,
>>
>> On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a
>> recent blog post which you may be impacted by:
>> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/
>> <https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/>
>>
>> We will be seeking input and requirements in an open and transparent manner
>> on the future of a git forge solution which will be run by the CPE team on
>> behalf of the Fedora Community. This mail is being sent to the devel,
>> mindshare and council-discuss lists for maximum visibility on a BCC to allow
>> each list have their own views. Please forward it to any other list you may
>> feel is relevant to maximise the exposure.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Leigh
>
> Alright, I have some questions that are not answered by the blog post.
>
> - What is going to happen to the two pagure instances at pagure.io
> <http://pagure.io/>,
> and src.fedoraproject.org <http://src.fedoraproject.org/>?
>
> I think pagure.io <http://pagure.io/> is a good home for fedora-related
> projects (it was
> the successor to fedorahosted.org <http://fedorahosted.org/>, after all,
> IIRC). I know that many
> group efforts are hosting their source code, ticketing system, etc.
> there (Go SIG, Stewardship SIG, FPC, FESCo, etc.). If it is decided to
> shut down pagure.io <http://pagure.io/>, I assume those projects will have to
> be moved
> somewhere?
+1
> Also, it's very nice to have a PR-based workflow for some
> shared-maintenance packages on src.fedoraproject.org
> <http://src.fedoraproject.org/>, and I don't
> think losing that feature would be a good thing for fedora.
+1
> - How is GitHub considered to be an alternative here?
+1 …and to my knowledge GitHub is closed source.
> I don't think (public or hosted) GitHub can do what is currently done
> on src.fedoraproject.org <http://src.fedoraproject.org/>, can it?
> I'd also not want to see fedora use a closed-source product for such a
> core service ...
>
> - Which features are missing from pagure, compared to the other forges?
+1 It’s not clear reading the original POST
> For my purposes, I don't miss any feature on pagure.io <http://pagure.io/>
> compared to my
> repositories on github.com <http://github.com/>, and OTTOMH, I can't come up
> with any
> missing features, at all …
+1
>
> TL;DR:
> Can we please keep pagure? It already has the fedora-specific features
> we need, and I don't mind a "slow" pace of development.
> In my experience, it works really well, and I actually *like* to use
> it (which is not true for GitLab ... which is slow and horrible)
+1
> Fabio
I totally agree with Fabio, I can’t think of a single reason we should dismiss
pagure.
Ciao
Guido
FAS: tartina
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
