On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 9:57:59 PM MST Dan Čermák wrote: > Felix Schwarz <fschw...@fedoraproject.org> writes: > > Am 21.01.20 um 21:48 schrieb Guido Aulisi: > >> I totally agree with Fabio, I can’t think of a single reason we should > >> dismiss pagure. > > > > Gitlab is used by many free software communities like Freedesktop, Gnome, > > Debian. Using the same tools could help to facilitate > > inter-process/inter-distro collaboration. > > > > Personally I guess github would attract most contributions for Fedora from > > new contributors but it is closed source so I'd prefer gitlab for Fedora. > > (Though I somehow got used to pagure and getting the gitlab integration > > to the same level as pagure currently will be a lot of work for sure.) > > On top of that Gitlab is a huge Ruby on Rails application and (at least > I have the feeling that) the Fedora community doesn't have so many Ruby > developers in comparison to Python developers, so implementing something > comparable could be challenging let alone from the manpower point of > view. > And then there's the issue that we are not upstream and might have to > maintain the integration as a downstream patch forever as upstream might > not want it. > > > Cheers, > > Dan
If these Python people really can't figure out Ruby, a language binding can be generated.. However, Ruby is much more clean than Python, and there's no requirement for downstream patches anyway. GitLab has a plugin interface these days. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
