On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:56 AM Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com> wrote: > > We haven't ironed out the full details but what was incredibly clear to us > was that Gitlab was the decision to make. The next step in getting there is > what we are engaging in now to get thoughts and suggestions and expect > several threads in that capacity from a technical perspective in the coming > weeks and months.
It is not incredibly clear to the respondents on devel@. I don't care to imagine what stronger disagreement on this particular point looks like. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:27 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I was referring to, and I was expecting, an open conversation about > the User Story list, an open analysis of the requirements list. In > other words: > > 1. Open conversation to gather requirements. Done. > 2. Publication of User Story list. > 3. Open conversation to discuss (2). > 4. Publication of the final decision. > > I was expecting (3), and it's missing. I concur, and don't think the missing piece has been adequately addressed. There's a reason why there's bewilderment at the decision, it's not ignorable. Were there deliberations by CPE Team in between (2) and (4)? Is there a record of those deliberations? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
