On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 8:31 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > To clarify: In Fedora Core/Extras the separation was by access permissions. > Here > it is based on knowledge and interests (or a lack thereof). People with zero > knowledge and interest in "RHEL next" development will not be able to > contribute > to Fedora packages (as easy as before) because the sources are no longer only > meant for Fedora. >
It's a bit of a divergence, but... From my foggy memories of my early days in Fedora (I started in the Fedora Project as a contributor officially in November 2007, but I had been lurking and poking around for two years prior), the Core/Extras split was slightly more complicated than that. It was true that were was an ACL split, but there was also a CVS tree split and the Fedora "Core" was maintained within the Red Hat Dist-CVS (though nobody called it that back then!) and synced out to the public CVS tree for Fedora Core. The transition to the merged CVS tree involved a lot of complicated work from a lot of different people, and ultimately enabled discontinuing the weird setup for Core with Fedora 7 and transitioning to the Koji build system and Bodhi update system, which we still use today. The transition to Dist-Git in 2009 would have been ridiculously more difficult if that hadn't happened already. In case anyone wants to take a trip down memory lane: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/CoreExtrasMerge -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
