On 19. 04. 20 16:39, Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:11 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
Correction, this is valid:

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#local-version-identifiers

But in this package case, we don't want version 0, so valid, but wrong.


Followup on the generator problem:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1183

   - the traceback should say: Cannot process Python package version: 0+unknown
   - the build should abort on errors
   - the version is actually valid

Thanks for the detective work, Miro.  I wish this upstream would just
release a new version.

Anyway, now that I know what the immediate problem is, I'll try to
work around it.  Regards,

In this particular case the version is trying to be read from git, I recommend using %autosetup -S git and creating a %{version} tag in %prep.

I'll send a PR shortly.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to