Hi Dominique, Dominique Martinet <asmad...@codewreck.org> writes:
> *snip* > > 341 to 130ms is a good start I guess, the rest of the waiting time > probably now outweights bash and will get some looking at at a later > point, but might as well start somewhere. That's quite the improvement! Good job and thanks for looking into that! > > How should I go about with that? Open bz bugs to all the packages I > listed? I would suggest to directly create pull requests on pagure (with a reference to this thread), as that will make it more likely that this change will actually happen. > strongly suggesting to get things to move to /usr/share (17) and > flatpak (suggest some kind of cache? not sure they'll be > interested...) and environment-modules (not sure what to suggest > there, I only have environment-modules because I need to test > something with openmpi from time to time and it comes with it...) > > > It might also make sense to have a packaging guideline suggesting to > avoid /etc/bash_completion.d in favor of the /usr/share variant, I > couldn't find anything here[1] but I might not have looked thoroughly > enough... Afaik we don't have an entry in the packaging guidelines about bash completion files. Maybe the packaging committee should look into that? Cheers, Dan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
