Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> writes: > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > >> How should I go about with that? Open bz bugs to all the packages I >> listed? strongly suggesting to get things to move to /usr/share (17) >> and flatpak (suggest some kind of cache? not sure they'll be >> interested...) and environment-modules (not sure what to suggest >> there, I only have environment-modules because I need to test >> something with openmpi from time to time and it comes with it...) >> >> It might also make sense to have a packaging guideline suggesting to >> avoid /etc/bash_completion.d in favor of the /usr/share variant, I >> couldn't find anything here[1] but I might not have looked thoroughly >> enough... [1] >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > When you are at fixing a packaging of the completion scripts, please > make the dependency on bash-completion optional (Recommends: > bash-completion). It used to be a good habit to weaken the dependency > because not everyone is willing to pay the slow-down tax if he has no > use of the completion:
I would suggest that at the point where you're sacrificing shell friendliness in favor of performance, it might be a good time to switch over to dash https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dash Thanks, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
