Le vendredi 22 mai 2020 à 20:41 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot via devel a écrit : > > So, no use looking for non-executable /usr/share. A lot of /usr/share > is executable and will stay that way.
Also moving executable things somewhere else would make multiarch (more of) a major hassle. Because the somwehere else most people think of is /usr/lib. And then you end up with a situation where all the multilibs are not symetric and equal, because people had to sacrifice one of them and stuffed architecture independant parts there. The architecture independant/architecture specific split is one of the stong points of the current FHS. The legacy Unix people had to get it right because they were all deploying on mutually incompatible machine architectures. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
