On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 13:07 -0700, stan via devel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400
> Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy
> > An obvious example is Firefox.  Upstream, the Firefox project builds
> > primarily with Clang/LLVM.  Yet we force the Fedora package owner to
> > find and fix issues building with GCC then either carry those custom
> > fixes forward in Fedora or negotiate with upstream to get those
> > changes upstreamed.  While this process can be helpful in finding
> > non-portable code, this is ultimately a poor use of the packager's
> > time.
> 
> I compile firefox nightly locally from an hg repository.  What I notice
> is that although mozilla officially states that it is possible to limit
> resource use, even though I set a maximum thread count, or maximum
> load, the clang compiler grabs every core and maxes it out to 100%.
> Will this change help with that?  i.e.  is this a clang problem?  Or is
> my experience because of a problem with the firefox compilation process?
It's unclear if it's a problem in Clang/LLVM or the firefox build procedures. 
Regardless, this proposal shouldn't change/improve your issue in any way.

jeff
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to