On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 12:44 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:40:57AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > That binutils was rebuilt (thanks to Richard Jones) and I have now > > built an even newer one which contains a fix for AArch64 PLT problems. > > Both of these are built with LTO disabled, so the bug should not affect > > them. > > guestfish on x86-64 was failing for me with something that looks a lot > like the same PLT problem. But it's not aarch64. Very easy to > reproduce, see: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ULGH5JYL7MHKDKTINJLOEN2QG6LOHWH7/
Just for the record, I don't think that is the aarch64 plt thing. Which is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862110 That would show up as "Failed to update file: invalid section entry size". I think this is a real LTO issue (both the aarch64 plt and zero DWARF version weren't, just "normal" bugs in binutils as and binutils ld, unrelated to LTO). Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
