On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:36 AM Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:35:12PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > But also, we're not using unsquashfs for boot or installation. The > > squashfs image is loop mounted and treated as a random access file > > system. Decompression of blocks is on demand. > > Well, maybe we should? It makes a pretty fast test. :)
It'll still boot as a random access device on loop. There's no place to unsquash it at this point. This change for Fedora 34 originally planned to use unsquashfs instead of rsync, but it's now optional. I'm not sure whether it will happen. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFSOnDVDByRemovingEXT4FilesystemImageLayer https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2292 -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
