On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 14:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:08 PM Marius Schwarz < > fedora...@cloud-foo.de> wrote: > > Am 18.01.21 um 09:35 schrieb Daniel Mach: > > > DNF 5 > > > ----- > > > * The goal is to remove redundant code and make sure all tools > > built > > > on top libdnf work the same (DNF currently uses a different code > > path > > > than microdnf and PackageKit) > > > > Can you add a new goal: > > > > Don't use Python for it, as it it's slow on mobile devices like > > Pinephone a.s.o. > > > > > Have you tried microdnf? > AIUI Marius is suggesting we highlight the increased performance of the C++ microdnf over the original dnf?
(As is, the work is indeed already happening, it just needs better promotion). Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
