On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:43:34AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 4/26/2021 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Kevin, I'd love to support your stance and use GCC. However, there are
> > > reasons why we will need to consider Clang for e.g. Ruby:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721553
> > >
> > > And the reason is not even that upstream favors Clang. The situation is
> > > unfortunately not just black and white.
> > Looks like the best solution there is to disable PCH support in the Ruby
> > JIT.
>
> FWIW Vit, myself and others have already extensively discussed this
> situation. Clang is really the best solution in the case of the Ruby JIT
> given the various constraints in play.
Isn't that MIR instead?
Jakub
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
