On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:24 AM Owen Taylor <otay...@redhat.com> wrote: > GLib 2 was quite compatible with GLib 1 - there were lots of additions > but few breaking changes. But it looks like the dependency in > surf-geometry is a GTK 1 user interface (written in C++ with a bit of > custom glue, with Xlib usage mixed in.) and a GTK 1 to GTK 2 port is > more work. Not that hard for someone experienced in the GTK *of that > time* , but at this point, it would be like translating Chaucer into > Elizabethan English. And porting to GTK 3 or GTK 4 would be a bigger > job. I think this pretty clearly falls into the "if someone cared > about this GUI, they would have ported it from GTK 1 long ago" bucket. > > But it also looks like it could just be disabled without affecting > anything else.
That's the conclusion I came to as well. Paulo, will you be sad if we turn off the surf-geometry GUI? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
