On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 8:15 AM Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe this patch is not correct. > > "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm." > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ > > In the README file there is writted: "cdparanoia (the command line tool) is > released under the GPLv2. The interface and paranoia libraries are covered > by the LGPLv2.1." > > So, it doesn't really matter if two source files are distributed under the > GPLv2+ license. The resulting binary (i.e. /usr/bin/cdparanoia) will always > be GPLv2. >
The issue here is that there's not a way to describe the SRPM license separate from the binary RPM license. So that information is important for SRPM distribution. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
