Hello Sahana and Jakub,

openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet,
but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa
server fail to even start.

Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream 9 build of openssl-pkcs11 were
successful, I think there are missing changes required on Rawhide.
Please include required fixes also in Rawhide.

Is there any timeline, when would be FTBFS bugs filled? I did not yet
found any bug on openssl-pkcs11. I would expect openssl engine packages
would be ready before mass rebuild. Could it be fixed soon please?

Cheers,
Petr

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005832

On 9/20/21 10:47, Sahana Prasad wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:50 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:09 AM Sahana Prasad <sah...@redhat.com>
>     wrote:
>     >
>     > Hello all,
>     >
>     > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in
>     rawhide now.
>     > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now.
>     >
>     > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them.
>     > I haven't reported FTBFS bugs right away. As I know many
>     packages have the porting ready already
>     > and they were waiting for 3.0.0 to land in rawhide.
>     > Some packages fail due to usage of deprecated functions. 
>     Consider treating those warnings as not errors
>     > for a quick fix and you could slowly stop using deprecated
>     functions in the future.
>     >
>     > Thanks Miro for your help with building packages in the side-tag
>     and getting a list of failed packages.
>     >
>     > We will try a rebuild of all these failed packages after 3/4
>     weeks and report bugs for failing packages then.
>     >
>
>     I noticed that the changelog for the openssl package got truncated. Is
>     there a reason for this? The spec file wasn't significantly rewritten,
>     nor was there some other condition invalidating the entire recorded
>     history of the package. Would you kindly please restore the changelog
>     to the spec file?
>
>  
> Hi Neal,
> I will restore it.
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Sahana Prasad
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to