Hi everyone, Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0. We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
Thank you, Regards, Sahana Prasad On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Sahana Prasad <sah...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in >> rawhide now. >> > You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. >> > >> > The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. >> >> I have switched the following packages to OpenSSL 1.1 explicitly as they >> will >> not support OpenSSL 3.0: >> >> python2.7 >> python3.7 >> python3.6 >> pypy >> pypy3.7 >> >> See an example PR for inspiration: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.6/pull-request/36 >> >> The constrict is compatible with Fedora 33-35 as well. >> >> It is not compatible with RHELs, but if deemed necessary, we can add >> openssl1.1 >> matapackage to EPEL. >> >> I've also requested the openssl1.1-devel provide to be added to RHEL 8, >> but it >> might be rejected or take a long time: >> > > Hi Miro, > > Thanks for reporting this RFE. We have decided to provide support for it. > > Thank you, > Regards, > Sahana Prasad > >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006238 >> >> -- >> Miro Hrončok >> -- >> Phone: +420777974800 >> IRC: mhroncok >> >>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure