On 24. 11. 21 10:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:37 PM Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
I am preparing to migate a F35 system to new hardware and was sanity checking
the whole system. One thing I found was that there are a number of system
directories that that are not owned by the package that uses them:
/var/cache/ibus
/var/cache/PackageKit
/var/cache/cups
/var/log/anaconda
/var/lib/tpm2-tss
/var/lib/machines
/var/lib/hsqldb
/var/lib/cs
/var/lib/rpcbind
/var/lib/portables
/etc/module-build-service
/etc/default
/etc/pesign
/etc/ipa
/etc/ndctl
/etc/flatpak
Should there be a gating or other test that catches this?
I've also noticed this problem, but with old python directories
lingering after upgrades.
For example, on my upgraded-from-ages-ago Fedora 35 Workstation
machine, I still had empty directory trees for old pythons, i.e.
directory trees containing empty "package" directories and empty
__pycache__ directories in
/usr/lib{,64}/python3.{7,8,9}/site-packages/
Looks like a missing file / directory ownership problem in some python packages.
Yes, I regularly file bugzillas for packages that do that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
