On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:53:04 -0500
"Steven A. Falco" <stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are some CVE's against KiCad that have been fixed in the latest 
> version, namely KiCad 6.0.2.  I've built that for F36 and Rawhide.
> 
> I have not released KiCad 6.0.2 into Fedora 34 and 35, because my 
> understanding is that by policy, we don't generally allow "major version" 
> updates in stable Fedora releases.  Thus F34 and F35 still ship KiCad 5.1.12, 
> which is affected by the CVE's.
> 
> I could easily build KiCad 6.0.2 for F34 / F35 - in fact, I have done so in 
> the KiCad Copr repository.
> 
> So, should this situation be an exception to the policy of "no major version 
> changes in a stable release"?

as often, it depends :-)

- what's the severity level of the CVEs?
- does KiCad 6 come with substantial changes like UI redesign,
compatibility issues with previous release, etc?


                Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to