On 03.03.22 15:30, Michael J Gruber wrote:
So, I explicitely asked what your plan was and got no response.
I suggested to fix the problem at the root package and you went ahead
rebuilding depending packages.
I asked you to use proper commit messages/changelog if you do and got a series of "Rebuild
(leptonica)", "Bump as F36 needs another rebuild" and what not.
I asked you to at least reference the bz entries and you did not.
While I'm typing this a buildroot override comes along.
We do have an "unresponsive maintainer" process. Do we have an "unresponsive
irreponsible proven packager" process, too?
To be honest I'm saddened by such hostility. I maintain a pretty large
number of packages mostly in my free time, and I think it's fair to say
that I maintain most of the mingw and stack alone. I undertook a pretty
large effort to merge some mingw specs into the native specs reduce my
workload in the future, often working late into the night. At one point
I did 197 commits in one day, and for as much effort and concentration I
put into it, mistakes do happen - I am only human. But I think I've
always been responsive and taken care to address any issues in a timely
matter. So honestly, rather than attacking people for commit messages
and attacking me for "the problems I caused last time", you might might
consider using a more friendly tone.
Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
