On 3/30/22 8:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all
targets enabled on Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_51-52
OK, bug filed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070151
After finding out I'm LLVM-ignorant I added a BR for the LLVM linker to wine to
resolve the configure test issue.
The build[1] now fails in a post-compile LLVM rpm script.
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-llvm-compile-lto-elf -O2 -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -mbranch-protection=standard -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--build-id=sha1
-Wl,-dT,/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-7.5/.package_note-wine-7.5-1.fc37.aarch64.ld
Checking for LLVM bitcode artifacts
Unpacking ar archive
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wine-7.5-1.fc37.aarch64/usr/lib64/wine/aarch64-windows/libdbghelp.a
to check for LLVM bitcode components.
/tmp/tmp.HfhQjpRaux ~/build/BUILD/wine-7.5
Repacking ./dbghelp.dll into
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wine-7.5-1.fc37.aarch64/usr/lib64/wine/aarch64-windows/libdbghelp.a.
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-llvm-compile-lto-elf: line 34: 569514 Segmentation
fault (core dumped) ar r ${archive} ${archived_file}
Who is at fault? Binutils? LLVM?
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84939948
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
