On 16/05/2022 16:33, Andrew Hughes wrote:
These proposals do ask for exceptional treatment for the JDKs on
Fedora, but it's an attempt to move away from what is an exceptional
way of building the JDK that differs from other vendors and puts
the Fedora JDK at a disadvantage in many situations.
If current maintainers can't continue maintaining the well-packaged
OpenJDK, I think it's time to retire it. It would be better not to have
OpenJDK on Fedora than to have statically linked blobs with ugly fonts
that make the user's eyes bleed.
Likewise, with
security fixes; it may mean we pick up a security fix early via the
system library being updated, but it may also mean we are later than
other JDKs because we are waiting on system library updates as well.
1. You can always send a PR to the system library package with CVE fix.
2. You do not need to rebuild OpenJDK after the system library update is
installed.
If there is significant opposition to this, I believe we would have to
look at reducing builds and testing on Fedora in other ways.
You can focus on building only one major LTS version, but against system
libraries.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
