On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:32:37AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > I've had a few off-list conversations with various community members > about this. One thing that came up was that the alternative namespace is > necessary, but also that "lom" is a sub-optimal choice. One idea that > did come up was simply to call them "net" (net0, etc.) or perhaps "net" > followed by another letter like "netm" or something. To avoid > bikeshedding this to death though, I think Matt's "lom" naming is fine > for the moment unless we happen to all agree on something else.
There's an upstream conversation about the naming convention here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=129003163201746&w=2 For the record, right now, biosdevname uses: emN_(vf).(vlan) for embedded devices pci(slot)#(port)_(vf).(vlan) for add-in cards. If the device does not support SR-IOV, then the _(vf) part is omitted. If no huge objections on the upstream thread, I'll push this into rawhide ASAP. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel