On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:11 AM Maxwell G via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Some of mine: > > - `dnf repoquery` -- Currently, `dnf5 repoquery` nowhere near meets the > capabilities of the old version. This is the most important to me.
I agree, repoquery is an absolutely essential tool for me. Without it, it would be impossible to maintain the number of packages I do without breaking things left and right twice a week. At the very least, dnf5-repoquery will need to support the most common things from "dnf repoquery", otherwise things will be very broken in many people's packaging automation, release engineering scripts, etc. > - `dnf system-upgrade` That also seems to be important ... Isn't "dnf system-upgrade" the "officially blessed" way of upgrading from one Fedora release to another on the command line? I also need "dnf repoclosure" ... without it, I'd need to either completely reimplement or shut down the service that provides "broken dependencies" / fails-to-install data for the Fedora Packager Dashboard. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
