On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation scheme. > > Is it though? I'm probibly reading this too quickly and missing > something, but isn't the underlying problem here that nghttp2 changed > abi and didn't change soname? If they had, soup would have kept the > older version around, or asked to upgrade both libsoup and libnghttp2?
No. libnghttp2 added one symbol, and (correctly, i.e. following the usual practice), it changed the suffix from .so.14.23.0 to .so.14.24.1. (The last number is bumped when the implementation of existing symbols changes, the middle one when when new symbols are added, and the first one when an incompatible change happens, i.e. symbols are removed or changed incompatibly. Lower numbers are reset to zero whenever a higher one changes.) The SOVERSION corresponds to the major number and does not change in the case under discussion. As Gordon wrote, our rpm dependency generation logic does not care about the minor or patch numbers. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
