* Petr Pisar: > V Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 06:12:11PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): >> >> I don't think convincing hundreds or thousands of developers to add symbol >> versioning to their libraries is a viable solution. I'd love to see it >> happen, but rpm/dnf should be more reliable in the meantime.
> Is symbol versioning portable across toolchains? I.e. is the linker > script with symbol aliases understandible by other tools than > (llvm|gcc)+binutils? I speak about upstreams who do not want to > impede building e.g. on FreeBSD, Windows, or Solaris. The GNU variant of symbol versioning is GNU-specific. Solaris symbol versioning is quite different, but maybe sufficient in this context for dependency generation. Windows doesn't have anything like it, as far as I know. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
