On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:35:15AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this > > > week: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > > > > > These are the builds in the side tag: > > > > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=63053&order=-build_id&latest=1 > > > > > > However I think some packages didn't get rebuilt. Definitely > > > systemtap, which causes this problem with qemu: > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/qemu?collection=f39 > > > > > > - nothing provides libboost_system.so.1.78.0()(64bit) needed by > > > systemtap-devel-4.8-2.fc38.x86_64 > > > > > > Possibly ceph, causing: > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/virt-v2v?collection=f39 > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/libguestfs?collection=f39 > > > > > > - nothing provides libboost_thread.so.1.78.0()(64bit) needed by > > > librados2-2:17.2.5-11.fc39.x86_64 > > > - nothing provides libboost_iostreams.so.1.78.0()(64bit) needed by > > > librados2-2:17.2.5-11.fc39.x86_64 > > > > > > There's a comment in the current ceph package saying that it's > > > incompatible with boost 1.81 so they've switched back to the bundled > > > copy. However we still don't have an installable package. > > > > > > I think systemtap needs to be added to the list of packages that > > > depend on boost for next time. The systemtap spec file is a maze of > > > twisty RPM macros all alike, so perhaps whatever script is used to > > > check for things requiring boost got confused: > > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemtap/blob/rawhide/f/systemtap.spec > > > > systemtap is already in the list (and I bumped the spec file for it > > before Tom started the rebuilds). > > > > It didn't get rebuilt because it depends on dyninst, which is FTBFS > > with GCC 13 due to header changes (I think fche has a fix pending). > > > > Once dyninst has been rebuilt, then systemtap can be rebuilt. > > FWIW the list of packages to rebuild for Boost is obtained using this > command, which I ran on Monday just before the rebuilds started: > > dnf repoquery -s --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libboost\* > --repo=fedora | sed -n 's/-[[:digit:]].*//p' | grep -v '^boost$' | > sort -u > > If there's something wrong with that, we can change it.
Thanks & I think that's correct. Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? I don't think we need to rebuild any of the virt packages -- hopefully once systemtap and ceph are fixed it should just work -- but I can do that if necessary. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
