ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this morning.
usr/include/boost/asio/async_result.hpp:651:9: error: no type named
'completion_handler_type' in 'class
boost::asio::async_result<boost::asio::basic_yield_context<boost::asio::executor>,
void(boost::system::error_code, ceph::buffer::v15_2_0::list)>'
651 | completion_handler_type;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:04 AM Kaleb Keithley <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:19 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:11:13PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph?
>> >
>> > No idea, sorry.
>>
>> Ceph is likely #2169364 aka https://gcc.gnu.org/PR108773 , still
>> unresolved
>> GCC bug.
>>
>
> Doubtful. That's from building early snapshots of what will become
> ceph-18. Thus far ceph-17 hasn't hit the ICE.
>
> right now the issue is with the bundled boost building with Python-3.11.
> There are a lot of moving parts.
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
