On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:13, stan via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
> Globe Trotter via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade
> > from F37 and so I was wondering about it.
>
> As near as I can tell, there is no package in fedora called
> texlive-was-9.
>
>

In Fedora 37 base there was:

```
/srv/web/pub/fedora/linux/releases/37/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/t/texlive-was-svn21439.0-59.fc37.noarch.rpm
Name        : texlive-was
Epoch       : 9
Version     : svn21439.0
Release     : 59.fc37
Architecture: noarch
Install Date: (not installed)
Group       : Unspecified
Size        : 14330
License     : Public Domain
Signature   : RSA/SHA256, Tue 02 Aug 2022 08:31:29 GMT, Key ID
f55ad3fb5323552a
Source RPM  : texlive-2021-59.fc37.src.rpm
Build Date  : Mon 01 Aug 2022 16:30:45 GMT
Build Host  : buildvm-ppc64le-37.iad2.fedoraproject.org
Relocations : (not relocatable)
Packager    : Fedora Project
Vendor      : Fedora Project
URL         : http://tug.org/texlive/
Bug URL     : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/texlive
Summary     : A collection of small packages by Walter Schmidt
Description :
A bundle of packages that arise in the author's area of
interest: compliance of maths typesetting with ISO standards;
symbols that work in both maths and text modes commas for both
decimal separator and maths; and upright Greek letters in
maths.
```

These were built out of the main texlive package. This package was also in
the F38 repository

/pub/fedora/linux/releases/38/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/t/texlive-was-svn64691-65.fc38.noarch.rpm

so it should have been updated unless some other package problem stopped
it. Try doing a `dnf reposync`


> There is a package
> texlive-wasy-10:svn53533-65.fc38.noarch.rpm
> that contains
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/source/public/wasy/wasy9.mf
> in F38.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33307983
>
> Is that what you mean?  It seems to be there in F38.  Is it possible
> that it has conflicts, and so wasn't updated?
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to