On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 18:30, Globe Trotter via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade from > F37 and so I was wondering about it. > > Hi, I think the 9 is a red herring, On (docker) Fedora 37 # dnf info texlive-was Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:36 ago on Thu Apr 27 12:41:26 2023. Available Packages Name : texlive-was Epoch : 9 Version : svn21439.0 Release : 60.fc37 Architecture : noarch Size : 13 k Source : texlive-2021-60.fc37.src.rpm Repository : updates Summary : A collection of small packages by Walter Schmidt On (also docker) Fedora 38 # dnf info texlive-was Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:27 ago on Thu Apr 27 12:38:49 2023. Available Packages Name : texlive-was Epoch : 10 Version : svn64691 Release : 65.fc38 Architecture : noarch Size : 13 k Source : texlive-2022-65.fc38.src.rpm Repository : fedora Summary : A collection of small packages by Walter Schmidt The package seems to be there. There could a different dependency that's blocking the upgrade of texlive* Cheers, Carlos -- "Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.'' Winston Churchill https://stackoverflow.com/users/3670118/casep
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
