On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 10:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > This is both too much and not enough.
Right; and I think a different Fedora feature proposal would be a good idea for the version of Fedora when we switch to UKIs. Where we can just have /boot/efi and not /boot -- but that's not what this proposal is about. This is primarily to keep firmware updates working, and as a secondary measure maybe more people can test UKIs. I don't want this simple feature of "unbreak future firmware updates" to become "completely rework how we boot the system". > (Point 2. is not really *necessary* for the size changes, but it'd be > nice to get rid of this anachronism if this area is being touched.) I think that's fine -- but I don't think the onus should be on me to push it through. Like I said to Lennart, if you want to do a Fedora proposal to rework all this stuff to remove /boot that's fine, but please don't hijack this one and make me responsible for doing the work. Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
