On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 07:09:49PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > I suppose I would belong to the latter. From a Server admin’s POV the modules > are a great chance to keep some backwards compatibility with our fast pacing > distro. The most prominent example is PostgreSQL. It is not so rare that the > new major version requires an adjustment in the application programme or at > least an extensive test. And every major update also requires a migration of > the entire data stock. Modularisation is a welcome opportunity to quickly > switch to a new release and use new capabilities, but to carry out the > adaptation / tests with PostgreSQL at your leisure.
There's a proposal to provide parallel postgresql versions via plain old normal traditional boring packages: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/pull-request/59 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
