On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:46 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher proposed a change to FESCo voting rules [1].
This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely clarification. There's not much in the way of substance change. I did notice that the "fast track" voting mechanism fell out. I think that's worth preserving. Also, the proposal says "eligible voters" a lot. Let's replace it with "FESCo members" to make it more clear that it's not a wide-open vote. If you really want, you can say "eligible FESCo members", but there's not been any case that I'm aware of where a FESCo member was ineligible to vote on something, so adding that word inserts unnecessary complexity. > Change ticket is assumed to be a a formal proposal upon creation. Duplicate "a" > An official vote in a ticket must be one of +1, -1 as defined herein: I suggest striking "as defined herein" for simplicity. Also you may want to include 0 in the sentence since it's in the list that follows. > At the end of one week, if a ticket has at least 3 votes of +1 and no > votes of -1, it is approved and may proceed with implementation. If > there is at least one -1 vote, the ticket must be added to the > upcoming meeting agenda and subject to the Meeting Votes rules. I'd make that "…and is subject…" > A proposal must achieve a majority (at least 51%) of +1 votes from > eligible voters. Votes must be one of +1, 0 or -1 as defined herein: s/as defined herein/g :-) > +1 I am in favor of the proposal as currently written. > > 0 I am electing to remove myself from the list of eligible > voters. This reduces the denominator of the fraction required to > achieve the 51% majority. In effect, I am agreeing to vote with > the remaining majority, whatever they decide. > > -1 I am opposed to the proposal as currently written. This largely duplicates the definitions for in-ticket votes. It might be better to just refer to that and add the special meaning of 0. Something like: A proposal must achieve a majority (at least 51%) of +1 votes from eligible voters. Votes must be one of +1, 0 or -1 as described in Ticket votes. In a meeting vote, a vote of 0 reduces the denominator of the fraction required to achieve the 51% majority. In effect, it says "I am agreeing to vote with the remaining majority, whatever they decide." -- Ben Cotton (he/him) TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcotton _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
