* Josh Boyer:

> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > * Miro Hrončok:
>> >
>> >> glibc32                                   codonell, fweimer, jakub, 
>> >> mcermak
>> >
>> > Is this about FTBFS issues?  There isn't any recent build failure in
>> > Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list?
>>
>> The build currently in Rawhide was done on Fedora 36 which is end of life.
>>
>> Apparently the release engineering team has not rebuilt this package in a 
>> mass
>> rebuild at least since Fedora 35.
>>
>> To remove it from the list, build the package on Rawhide please.
>
> Or we could not, and drop i686 completely.

If we drop glibc32, we can't build any 32-bit code at all because GCC
will no longer support -m32.  In this regardm x86-64 is different than
the other Fedora architectures which can target bare metal 32-bit even
from 64-bit-only compilers.

Are bootloaders fully treated as firmware and no longer built by Fedora?
At least the shim package does not come with corresponding source code
AFAICS.  But I expect that there are other 32-bit pre-boot packages that
we still rebuild.

We need to fix this GCC build issue for CentOS 10 eventually, and at
that point, we won't need glibc32 anymore.  It's been a constant source
of annoyance.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to