Il 24/09/23 01:18, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos
>> <alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could someone involved
>>> with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our
>>> documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC need
>>> to decide on this?
>>   From upstream perspective: appstream-util is indeed obsolete. Upstream
>> software should stop using it and switch to appstreamcli instead.
>>
>> But as you've noticed, it seems Fedora isn't ready for that yet....
> Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use
> appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream
> metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up.
>
If upstream switched to appstreamcli, what tool do they use to generate 
the index to not fail validation?
Can Fedora switch to that other tool?

Mattia

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to