V Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:16:39AM -0500, Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:03 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I believe that one of the strong complains was related to not signed > > packages. The use case is that when I build RPMs locally and then I install > > them (see bellow). > > > > dnf install *.rpm --setopt=localpkg_gpgcheck=true > > ... > > Package dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > Package dnf-automatic-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not > > signed > > Package dnf-data-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > Package python3-dnf-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > Package yum-4.17.1-1.git.9598.552e61e.fc38.noarch.rpm is not signed > > Error: GPG check FAILED > > > > Jaroslav > > I think for the sake of security, it'd be better if this were on by > default, and you just had to specify the --nogpgcheck
Technical note: --nogpgcheck does not imply localpkg_gpgcheck=false. Both of them operate independently. That's another painful property of the current code and documentation. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
