On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +0000 > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:27:53AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > A quick note that you may be seeing pull requests for riscv64 changes > > > > against your packages, like these examples: > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc/pull-request/7 > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zlib-ng/pull-request/11 > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdal/pull-request/21 > > > > > > > > For many years we have been building Fedora for the RISC-V > > > > architecture on a separate build system at > > > > http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/ , and maintaining downstream patches > > > > against dist-git in http://fedora.riscv.rocks:3000/rpms/ > > > > (Most of this work was done by David Abdurachmanov, not me.) > > > > > > I'm very happy to see these start to land, let me know if you need any > > > assistance. > > > > > > > I'm trying to get as much of this stuff back into Fedora dist-git, > > > > although only (hopefully!) where it doesn't break ordinary builds and > > > > isn't intrusive. Obviously I may get this wrong sometimes so feel > > > > free to make comments if you disagree with changes. > > > > > > > > Some time, with any luck soon, we will be creating a new Koji instance > > > > with FAS authentication which will allow anyone to optionally build > > > > their packages on RISC-V builders. And then later in the year we may > > > > be in a position with the availability of new hardware to discuss > > > > adding RISC-V as a regular architecture. (We're not there yet as > > > > current hardware is far too slow to force it on Fedora developers.) > > > > > > Will this instance run with koji-shadow to properly mirror the builds > > > with all the appropriate NVR dependencies to properly mirror Fedora > > > primary builds? > > > > TBD. > > > > Koji-shadow specifically is unmaintained. Maybe we'll try to hack > > something together with scripts, or get koji-shadow working. > > on the other hand, it's still tags, targets, buildroots in koji ... > > I should be able dig out some koji-shadow know-how out of my memory if > needed. Those were wonderful years :-)
Many years ago I tried using koji-shadow, but I didn't like what it was doing. Cooking something custom seemed easier at that point. These days we also have side tags, and thus some bootstrap operations happen there. Sadly those get removed relatively soonish after the tag gets merged. Sometimes before I get a chance to grab it. Otherwise I have a good picture of Fedora package land over so many years. Our "dist-git overlay" is relatively small these days. Should be <300 packages, and majority of it was used to bump NVR for rebuilds. Cheers, david > > Dan > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
