On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:00 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > IOW, if [when] we rebase Fedora to the next QEMU upstream release, users > > > > with older x86_64 hardware would likely be unable to run QEMU, from F41 > > > > onwards, unless some TBD action is taken. > > > > > > > > Thus I'm wondering whether Fedora has any policy or guidance on handling > > > > such a situation both in general, and more specifically for "critical > > > > path" > > > > packages, if that difference is relevant ? The packaging guidelines > > > > aren't > > > > especially explicit about this situation, unless I've missed something > > > > beyond the "compiler flags" and "architecture support" sections. > > > > > > > > > > Absent a project-wide decision to move to the newer baseline, I think > > > the best approach we can take would be to find some way to communicate > > > to the user that the software isn't usable. In the case of Qemu, does > > > the application report an error or crash if it's run on hardware > > > without the requisite baseline? > > > > I've not tested, but I would expect it to crash attempting to execute an > > illegal instruction > > > > OK, that's a situation that will lead to annoying and unresolvable bug > reports. Would it be possible to put something in place that would > check processor capabilities early in execution before hitting any of > the affected instructions?
Build the package as x86_64_v2 instead of x86_64. Not lying about the architecture will ensure that we don't bypass RPM's own compatible architecture check. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
