V Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:42:25AM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > 3. *Transparency:* You *MUST* disclose the use of AI tools when the > significant part of the contribution is taken from a tool without changes. > You *SHOULD* disclose the other uses of AI tools, where it might be useful. > Routine use of assistive tools for correcting grammar and spelling, or for > clarifying language, does not require disclosure. > I'm not sure how to deal with third-party contributions which I suspect of being produced by AI tools, but not being explicitly marked as such by the third party.
E.g. I, as a packager, find a patch in upstream bug tracker which I'd like to apply to a Fedora package, but which looks generated. Or an upstream of my package is known to accept AI-generated code, hence the generated code is probably contained in the upstream release. Should I insist on the 3rd-party contributor to provide the AI attribution before merging it? Or should I myself append a fuzzy disclaimer, like "this piece of work may contain AI-generated content"? Or should I simply ignore my opinion and merge the content as it is? -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
