On 14. 10. 25 13:39, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:42:25AM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
3. *Transparency:* You *MUST* disclose the use of AI tools when the
significant part of the contribution is taken from a tool without changes.
You *SHOULD* disclose the other uses of AI tools, where it might be useful.
Routine use of assistive tools for correcting grammar and spelling, or for
clarifying language, does not require disclosure.
I'm not sure how to deal with third-party contributions which I suspect of
being produced by AI tools, but not being explicitly marked as such by the
third party.
E.g. I, as a packager, find a patch in upstream bug tracker which I'd like to
apply to a Fedora package, but which looks generated. Or an upstream of my
package is known to accept AI-generated code, hence the generated code is
probably contained in the upstream release.
Should I insist on the 3rd-party contributor to provide the AI attribution
before merging it? Or should I myself append a fuzzy disclaimer, like "this
piece of work may contain AI-generated content"? Or should I simply ignore my
opinion and merge the content as it is?
I believe this is a valid concern. Could you please bring it up in the
discussion, so we don't discuss this policy at 2 different places? Thanks.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
