On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 12:20 PM Marián Konček <[email protected]> wrote: > > A change that went unnoticed for some time. > > The upstream project contains a plain LICENSE file which is identical to > the definition of `LGPL-2.1-only` but their source files include licence > headers explicitly stating: `SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later`. > > Therefore I conclude the effective license is `LGPL-2.1-or-later`.
As far as I know, the license texts for LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-2.1-or-later are actually the same (well, it *is* the LGPL v2.1 text in both cases) - whether it's "-only" or "-or-later" needs to be determined from other context. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
