Hi Zbyszek, On 19-Jan-26 12:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 03:47:03PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> I am happy to create a PR with the json files if upstream thinks that is a >>> good idea. >>> For now we have contributed the hwids to >>> https://github.com/TravMurav/dtbloader/ which >>> currently has the most comprehensive database of hwids I am aware of. >> >> If you could do that, that would be great. If we can get the json files >> included in systemd, then you could consider switching to systemd-stub (1) >> for the Ubuntu images too and at that point there will be no more need to >> maintain the stubble-fork, so that means less work for everyone. > > With the upstream hat on, I think it'd make a lot of sense to include > those files in the systemd upstream. This would be similar to the > existing mappings that we keep for keyboards mappings, hardware > descriptions, autosuspend rules, etc.
Ack, +100 > With the downstream hat on, what is the plan for this Change: with > the switch from stubble to sd-stub, where are the hwid → dtb mappings > coming from? stubble was already packaged before the decision to switch to systemd-stub was made. So for now I'm simply using the already packaged json files from the stubble package. Once these land in systemd-upstream and then trickle down to Fedora's systemd package I'll happily mark stubble as a dead-package and switch to systemd as source for these. Regards, Hans -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
