Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 1/15/26 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Which maintainer do we pass it to, if there are multiple? > > It has no obvious solution.
> It have - the most active one in package. If there is non such, then the most > active in whole distribution (from `that` package maintainers, the one which > contribute to most packages distribution-wide). See, that's where we get into the "no OBVIOUS solution" thing, because those are not the obvious actions everyone can agree on. In fact, I would personally argue that dumping even MORE work on the most active packagers (the busiest ones already dealing with the most packages) is exactly the wrong approach. They have enough going on already. Anyway, a package being orphaned is not a crisis event. In the short term, nothing changes, except that it gets placed on this report so that other packagers are aware that it's available in case they might have an interest in maintaining it. Even if a package manages to stay in orphaned state for 6 weeks and get retired, reversing that is not particularly difficult. It's not like the package is banned from the distro forever. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
