On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:19:03AM +0200, drago01 wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> >> >> for decades. Fedora 14's init system isn't that different to the first >> >> version >> >> of RHL (4.0) I started using back in 96. >> >> >> > This is somewhat misleading. There have been many rewrites of the init >> > system in the past decade. In fact, the Fedora 14 init system has the >> > capability to be quite different than the SysVinit scripts that were >> > adopted >> > in the mid-90s. What is true is that Fedora 14 had not switched to using >> > the incompatible-with-SysVinit features of its default (or any of its >> > optional) init systems so the presentation and behaviour was almost the >> > same as older SysVinit. >> >> That's true but due to the way we used it upstart was more or less a >> renamed sysVinit. >> > Which is what I said in my last sentence, yes? ;-)
Oh indeed ... probably a case of -E_NOCOFFEE ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
